What prompted you to write
Reason and Wonder: A Copernican Revolution in Science and Spirit? What “message” do you want to
communicate?
Humans have two very
different ways of making sense of the world. Let’s call them head knowledge and
heart knowledge. Many, particularly in the West, struggle to effectively
integrate these seemingly disparate modes of knowing. Because of the dynamics
of my upbringing as the son of a very rational father—a physician—and a very
intuitive and religious mother, that struggle was acute. On the one hand, I
majored in engineering, loved mathematics and science, was a child of the space
race, and eventually worked for NASA for a decade. On the other hand, I have a
“poet nature” and over the years had learned to listen carefully to the still
small voice of intuition. Well into my thirties, these two aspects often seemed
in conflict. The journey that culminated in Reason
and Wonder was initially a journey for personal integrity. But along the way, I came to suspect that the
roots of the conflict were societal and universal. At the societal level, the
tension between the rational and the intuitive plays out as the conflict
between science and religion that has dogged humankind since Descartes and
Copernicus.
Reason and Wonder has many subtexts. But the
primary one is that science and faith don’t have to be adversarial. They can be complementary. The individual who embraces both is more
whole, and the society built upon the wisdom of both is saner.
What was the highlight of your
research? In the course of your research, what discovery surprised you the
most? What surprises readers/others the most about your research?
Reason and Wonder represents a radical departure from my conventional academic research
in applied mathematics. History was never my strong suit, yet I had to awaken
an inner historian to complete Reason and
Wonder. What surprised me most was that, with enough digging, Copernicus,
Galileo, Kepler, Newton, Darwin, Einstein, and other iconic scientists—the
patriarchs of our scientific legacy—came alive. They’ve become my friends and
mentors. I have the utmost respect for what these men (and women, e.g.,
Rosalind Franklin) accomplished for science and humanity, often under the most
taxing or even crippling personal circumstances.
Reason and Wonder is a patchwork quilt of individual stories stitched together to tell
the big story of the cosmos and of our place as humans in it. What readers seem
to appreciate most is the richness and wonder of that story.
How did your research change your outlook on the subject?
It is too often assumed in
our polarized society that one must choose between science and faith, a choice
that Nobel laureate in chemistry Ilya Prigogine calls “tragic.” Therefore, it
surprised me, and it may surprise the reader, how key to their discoveries were
the religious impulses of the greatest scientists our species has produced.
Einstein may have put it best: “The most beautiful emotion we can experience is the mystical,” he
said. “It is the source of all true art and science.”
How have people reacted to
your book and/or the ideas you set forth? Is it what you hoped for, or is there
more work to be done?
This is my first book for the
general public. It took twelve years, six full revisions, and two good editors
before it was deemed ready for public consumption. And even then, I had to read
the final print edition from cover to cover before I felt confident that I’d
succeeded in telling a coherent story. Public reaction thus far has confirmed my
highest hopes. People from many walks of
life have found the story compelling, the prose “elegant,” and the science
accessible. I’m beginning to think Reason
and Wonder has very broad appeal, broader than anticipated. There seems to
be something for every inquisitive reader, anyone who wants to better
understand her or his genealogy in a cosmic sense.
What’s next for you?
Giving birth to Reason and Wonder was a long, slow
process. It began with a vague sense of
direction, gradually took shape, and then attained clarity. For me, writing is perhaps what sculpting is
for an artist: the belief that somewhere inside that block of marble rests an
object of beauty. On many occasions I
nearly gave up. The encouragement and
contributions of numerous friends, students, and acquaintances ultimately
brought the book to fruition. The process doesn’t end with publication. The
story has been written, but its healing message still needs to be heard. That’s
my job for the present. Perhaps I have
another book in me. Perhaps not.
Dave Pruett, a former NASA researcher, is an award-winning computational scientist and professor of mathematics at James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA.
No comments:
Post a Comment